Peculiarities of Bullying in the Modern Student Environment
Author`s Contribution:
- Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ukraine
Background and aim of study:
Modern educational area nowadays faced with a spread
of such phenomenon as bullying. This problem is not
new for Ukraine and foreign countries, but because of
its latency is not well researched. Nevertheless, the
scientists, who started researching it, already give
various definitions for bullying phenomenon.
Lane defines bullying as negative impact – violence,
emphasizing that bullying is a violence of physical or
psychical type that is being observed for a long time
from a side of individual person or a group of persons
in relation to the person, who cannot protect himself in
a specific situation. Berdyshev claims that bullying is
not a self-defense for the aggressor and notes the
awareness of the violence being committed. Solovyov
considers bullying as a variant of destructive conflict
interaction, noting that bullying occurs in a small
group, in which the violent acts committed against the
victim are of continuous recurrent nature. At the same
time, Solovyov draws attention to the presence of
witnesses of these violent actions. Graham with co-
authors notes the presence of an imbalance of forces
among the involved participants in bullying, their
cruelty towards each other, and the intention to apply
physical or psychological harm to the victim, thus
defining bullying as a type of social interaction.
Proponents of this approach perceive bullying as a type
of behavior in a group structure. Bullying founder
Olweus defines bullying as a stereotype of group
interactions, in which a person over time and
repeatedly encounters deliberate self-harm or
discomfort from another person or a group of people in
the context of “disproportionate “power” relations”.
Scientists have different views on the interpretation of
the concept, but it should be noted that regardless of
the interpretation of the phenomenon, bullying is
defined as a form of aggressive interactions. The main
idea that unites different points of view on the rhetoric
of these studies is that bullying is an act (action or
inaction) of participants in the educational process,
which consists in psychological, physical, economic,
sexual violence, including with the use of electronic
devices of communication, committed against a minor,
or by such a person in relation to other participants of
the educational process, as a result of which mental or
physical health of the victim may or has been harmed.
Results:
Bullying is manifested through various forms of
violence that are committed systematically against the
same person. These may be manifestations of:
1) physical violence, including pushing, touching,
kicking, fighting, kicking, slapping, hitting and other actions that cause pain and injury, etc.;
2) psychological violence, including insults, spreading
false rumors, ridicule, intimidation, isolation, ignoring,
boycott, refusal to communicate, threats, manipulation,
blackmail, etc.; 3) economic violence, including petty
theft, damage or destruction of personal belongings,
extortion of money, food, etc.; 4) sexual violence,
including insulting gestures, statements, nicknames,
jokes, threats, spreading rumors, touching sexual
(intimate) and/or content, etc.
It should be noted that bullying in the educational
environment occurs not only between students. A
specific problem in the educational environment is
bullying by teachers in relation to students. Such
bullying can be manifested through systematic actions:
unreasonable underestimation of grades, systematic
ignoring of the student’s opinion or actions, hanging
labels on the student, insulting words, intimidation.
With the development of modern electronic
technologies, violent actions (especially manifestations
of psychological and sexual violence) in bullying
(harassment) are often committed with the help of
electronic gadgets. Cyberbullying can take many
forms: flaming, assault (repeated abusive text
messages, constant calls, etc.), slander (spreading of
derogatory false information through text messages,
photos, videos using electronic gadgets), fraud or
extortion of confidential information (texts, photos,
videos and their transmission by the Internet or by mail
to those to whom it was not intended), stalking or
cyberpursuit (actions of covert surveillance, usually
done secretly, anonymously, to cause psychological or
physical harm), video recording of real attacks in order
to spread them over the Internet, the use of Internet
communication for further human actions, including its
sexual use or driving bullied person to suicide.
The analysis of psychological and pedagogical
literature allows us to state that the reasons for bullying
in interpersonal relationships can be different factors
that can be combined into four groups: personal,
family, social, environment.
Personal reasons – these are physical or psychological
features of the child (individual features of physical,
mental, intellectual development, appearance, etc.).
Thus, bullying is often initiated by students who have
certain individual psychological features and the
aggressive behavior provoked by it (attention deficit
disorder, hyperactivity disorder, behavioral disorders,
bipolar disorder, oppositional disorder, post-traumatic
stress disorder and others). Among the family factors
that determine a student’s aggressive behavior and can
provoke bullying are lack of close relationships with
parents, lack of their attention or authoritarian style of
communication, parental pressure or abuse.
Unfavorable socio-psychological climate in the
educational institution, stress from learning due to
overload, relationships with classmates and teachers,
lack of proper attention from teachers contribute to the
emergence of quarrels, conflicts, violence and their
transition to bullying. The most common factors that
provoke bullying in an educational institution are:
Authoritarian learning style. Sometimes lecturers
themselves can be the initiators of bullying, when the student is seen as an object of pedagogical influence,
rather than an equal partner. The lecturer personally
makes decisions, without taking into account the
thoughts of the student, establishes strict control over
the implementation of their requirements, as a result of
written above students lose activity, are characterized
by low self-esteem and aggression. In the authoritarian
style of teaching, students’ minds are focused on
psychological self-defense, rather than on the
acquisition of knowledge and personal self-
development. When a lecturer uses a system of group
punishment, when the whole group is punished for the
fault of an individual student, it increases the risk of
aggressive behavior among students. The lecturer who
mentions any student as a positive or negative example
for others often provokes rivalry, which in the future
may escalate into bullying of this student. Ignoring the
problem at the level of the educational institution.
Sometimes the teaching staff of an educational
institution refuses to recognize cases of bullying in a
group or educational institution as a whole, simply
ignoring this phenomenon. This, in one case, can be
perceived by students as a norm of behavior, and they
will copy this behavior. Feelings of impunity and
hopelessness often aggravate the situation with
bullying in an educational institution.
Conclusion:
All of the above makes it possible to conclude that
violence in the educational environment has a different
nature and character. It can manifest itself both in the
form of one-time and in the form of systematic actions.
But these actions always harm the mental and physical
health of all participants in this process. The reason for
the emergence of bullying in higher education is often
a low level of emotional intelligence of students, a low
level of skills of proper communication and
cooperation, tolerance and acceptance of otherness.
The most common consequences of bullying are
decreased academic performance, refusal to attend
school, and self-injurious behavior. Therefore, in
modern higher education, the priority of work on the
prevention of harassment and conflict becomes
obvious. Preventing bullying and creating a friendly
educational environment is not just a process. It is a
restructuring of the consciousness of everyone:
students, teachers, parents and other members of the
educational community.
DOI and UDC:
UDC: 37.015.3:37.032
DOI: 10.26697/ijes.2020.4.4
Information about the authors:
Bielikova Olena Vitaliivna – Senior Lecturer,
KNUCEA, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Research interests: higher education pedagogy,
psychology, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-112X
Dytiuk Svitlana Olexiivna – Senior Lecturer,
KNUCEA, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Research interests: higher education pedagogy,
psychology, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1025-2071
Krech Tetiana Vasylivna – Doctor of Philology,
Professor, KNUCEA, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Research interests: higher education pedagogy,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-1716